(no subject)
Sep. 5th, 2008 12:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
OK.
So, not only was Cindy McCain's convention outfit worth more than the average American house, it's boxy, hideous and made her look fat in most of the pictures.
Who pays $300,000 for one outfit? I mean seriously. What kind of good stewardship is that? What does it say about how logically and sensibly McCain, Inc (and most other People On the Top Rung) think about money?
What does it say about what they'll do with the people's money?
So, not only was Cindy McCain's convention outfit worth more than the average American house, it's boxy, hideous and made her look fat in most of the pictures.
Who pays $300,000 for one outfit? I mean seriously. What kind of good stewardship is that? What does it say about how logically and sensibly McCain, Inc (and most other People On the Top Rung) think about money?
What does it say about what they'll do with the people's money?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-05 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-05 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-06 03:49 am (UTC)I can't imagine. Since it's their own money they're spending. And pearls and diamonds still do cost serious big bucks, if they're real. And since the media's throwing stones, I'd like to point out that Michelle Obama ridiculed an economic stimulus payment as being barely enough to buy a pair of earrings. THAT is what I call out of touch.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 04:48 am (UTC)I hadn't heard the earrings remark. Wow. Out of touch indeed. There are some very real financial issues in this country today. Earrings are hardly priority.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-08 11:04 am (UTC)Speaking of, since I was thinking about Mrs. Obama's remark, it struck me as even stranger that she'd mention earrings. Because there are people - more ordinary people - who for [inexplicable] reasons do buy moderately-price designer shoes and handbags for at least several hundred dollars each. The attitude seems to be that these are investments because they're so well made, etc. Whatever. But I don't hear the same people ever talking about getting high-dollar jewelry, even though genuine gold and stones really ARE an investment. One of my brothers works at a coin shop/gold and silver exchange, and they're always getting old jewelry traded in simply for the value of the material. He's told me I ought to come in and look what they've got some time.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-11 01:47 am (UTC)Dan has invested in a lot of silver and a little gold - like the pre-1967 quarters and the Liberty dollars and such. He considers that to be really the only true currency and wants it to fall back on when and if the economy does go under sometime soon. I think it's a good idea - it will never lose its value, that's for sure. I never thought of jewels. I think Dan would probably look at that as less practical, just because it would be a large chunk sum rather than parceled into smaller portions like the silver dimes and quarters. Still, though, a couple pieces of good jewellery could still be a really good investment.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-11 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-11 02:16 am (UTC)